Typeface Similar to Font

Typeface Similar to Benton Sans: 7 Look-Alike Alternatives

Benton Sans, designed by Tobias Frere-Jones and Cyrus Highsmith for Font Bureau in 1995, is a refined, modernist sans-serif rooted in the legacy of Morris Fuller Benton’s 20th-century designs. Known for its clarity, balanced proportions, and broad range of weights, it’s a favorite in editorial design, branding, and corporate communications.

However, Benton Sans is a licensed font with a premium price tag. If you’re seeking a similar feel with different pricing, licensing, or subtle stylistic variations, there are plenty of alternatives worth exploring.

Here’s our curated list of 7 typefaces similar to Benton Sans, including both premium and free options.


Visual Comparison

Sample Text: The Quick Brown Fox Jumps Over The Lazy Dog

FontPreview
Benton SansImage preview here
WhitneyImage preview here
FF MetaImage preview here
Proxima NovaImage preview here
GothamImage preview here
Source Sans ProImage preview here
Work SansImage preview here
InterImage preview here

Premium Alternatives

1. Whitney (Tobias Frere-Jones, 2004)

  • Style: Sans-serif, Humanist
  • Why It’s Similar: Shares Benton Sans’ clarity and versatility while maintaining strong personality in corporate use.
  • Key Difference: Slightly softer curves, more humanist touches for warmer tone.
  • Price & Availability: Paid — Hoefler&Co.

2. FF Meta (Erik Spiekermann, 1991)

  • Style: Sans-serif, Humanist
  • Why It’s Similar: Matches Benton Sans’ functionality and legibility.
  • Key Difference: Slightly more open apertures and distinctive italic style.
  • Price & Availability: Paid — FontFont.

3. Proxima Nova (Mark Simonson, 2005)

  • Style: Sans-serif, Geometric-Humanist hybrid
  • Why It’s Similar: Shares Benton Sans’ modern proportions and multipurpose design.
  • Key Difference: More geometric structure and slightly different spacing.
  • Price & Availability: Paid — Mark Simonson Studio.

4. Gotham (Tobias Frere-Jones, 2000)

  • Style: Sans-serif, Geometric
  • Why It’s Similar: Clean, modern appearance with balanced proportions.
  • Key Difference: Inspired by American vernacular signage, slightly squarer shapes.
  • Price & Availability: Paid — Hoefler&Co.

Free Alternatives

5. Source Sans Pro (Paul D. Hunt, 2012)

  • Style: Sans-serif, Humanist
  • Why It’s Similar: Offers Benton Sans–like clarity with wide usability.
  • Key Difference: Open-source design, slightly narrower forms.
  • Price & Availability: Free — Google Fonts.

6. Work Sans (Wei Huang, 2015)

  • Style: Sans-serif, Humanist/Geometric hybrid
  • Why It’s Similar: Clear, contemporary look with versatile weights.
  • Key Difference: Slightly more geometric feel in lighter weights.
  • Price & Availability: Free — Google Fonts.

7. Inter (Rasmus Andersson, 2017)

  • Style: Sans-serif, Neo-Grotesque/Humanist blend
  • Why It’s Similar: Modern, highly readable sans optimized for screens.
  • Key Difference: Variable font version with extended character set.
  • Price & Availability: Free — Google Fonts.

Recommendation Summary Table

Font NameSimilarity Score (1–5)Free/PaidBest For
Whitney★★★★★PaidHigh-end corporate branding
FF Meta★★★★☆PaidEditorial & government projects
Proxima Nova★★★★☆PaidWeb & brand identity
Gotham★★★★☆PaidBold, modern branding
Source Sans Pro★★★★☆FreeUI/UX & web applications
Work Sans★★★☆☆FreeDigital interfaces & print
Inter★★★★☆FreeScreen-based design

Conclusion

For a premium match, Whitney is the closest to Benton Sans with added warmth.
If you want free options, Source Sans Pro and Inter provide superb usability for web and UI design.
For a more geometric twist, try Proxima Nova or Gotham for fresh branding projects.