Typeface Similar to Font

Typeface Similar to Charter: 7 Look-Alike Alternatives

Charter, designed by Matthew Carter in 1987, is a transitional serif created for clarity, economy, and durability in printing. Its sturdy serifs, open counters, and balanced proportions make it a reliable choice for books, reports, and academic publications.

If you love Charter’s no-nonsense elegance but need different licensing options or a slightly different flavor, these 7 alternatives — from direct commercial cousins to high-quality free options — will give you the same dependable performance.


Visual Comparison
Sample Text: The Quick Brown Fox Jumps Over The Lazy Dog

FontPreview
CharterImage preview here
ITC CharterImage preview here
Mercury TextImage preview here
GeorgiaImage preview here
UtopiaImage preview here
PT SerifImage preview here
Crimson TextImage preview here
Source Serif ProImage preview here

Premium Alternatives

1. ITC Charter (Matthew Carter, 1990)

  • Style: Transitional serif
  • Why It’s Similar: Same designer, refined version of the original Charter.
  • Key Difference: Slightly more polished shapes and kerning adjustments.
  • Price & Availability: Paid — Monotype.

2. Mercury Text (Jonathan Hoefler, 2003)

  • Style: Transitional serif
  • Why It’s Similar: Sturdy structure and excellent for small sizes.
  • Key Difference: More high-contrast and modern details.
  • Price & Availability: Paid — Hoefler & Co.

3. Georgia (Matthew Carter, 1993)

  • Style: Transitional serif
  • Why It’s Similar: Large x-height and excellent on-screen clarity.
  • Key Difference: More casual tone with slightly rounder shapes.
  • Price & Availability: Free/System font.

4. Utopia (Robert Slimbach, 1989)

  • Style: Transitional serif
  • Why It’s Similar: Open counters and solid readability in print.
  • Key Difference: More calligraphic italic forms.
  • Price & Availability: Free — Adobe Fonts.

Free Alternatives

5. PT Serif (ParaType, 2009)

  • Style: Transitional serif
  • Why It’s Similar: Solid, workhorse serif for text-heavy layouts.
  • Key Difference: Slightly more warmth in letterforms.
  • Price & Availability: Free — Google Fonts.

6. Crimson Text (Sebastian Kosch, 2010)

  • Style: Transitional serif
  • Why It’s Similar: Inspired by classic book typefaces, great for print.
  • Key Difference: Slightly more delicate and literary in tone.
  • Price & Availability: Free — Google Fonts.

7. Source Serif Pro (Frank Grießhammer, 2014)

  • Style: Transitional serif
  • Why It’s Similar: Neutral and versatile with great digital rendering.
  • Key Difference: More modern proportions and lighter italics.
  • Price & Availability: Free — Google Fonts.

Recommendation Summary Table

Font NameSimilarity ScoreFree/PaidBest For
ITC Charter★★★★★PaidProfessional publishing
Mercury Text★★★★★PaidHigh-end editorial
Georgia★★★★☆Free/SystemWeb typography
Utopia★★★★☆FreeBooks & magazines
PT Serif★★★★☆FreeAcademic reports
Crimson Text★★★★☆FreeLiterary work
Source Serif Pro★★★★☆FreeDigital UI & print

Conclusion
For the closest match, ITC Charter and Mercury Text retain Charter’s functional elegance in a commercial package. For budget-friendly options, PT Serif, Crimson Text, and Source Serif Pro bring comparable legibility and charm for free.