Georgia, designed by Matthew Carter in 1993 for Microsoft, is a serif typeface created specifically for clarity on low-resolution screens. With its large x-height, open letterforms, and warm, humanist feel, Georgia quickly became a go-to choice for websites, digital publications, and modern branding projects.
However, Georgia’s widespread use can make it feel familiar, and in some cases, you might prefer a typeface with a similar digital readability but a slightly different character, licensing model, or design personality.
Here’s our curated list of 7 typefaces similar to Georgia, including both premium and free alternatives.
Visual Comparison
Sample Text: The Quick Brown Fox Jumps Over The Lazy Dog
| Font | Preview |
|---|---|
| Georgia | Image preview here |
| Charter | Image preview here |
| FF Tisa | Image preview here |
| Mercury Text | Image preview here |
| Miller Text | Image preview here |
| Source Serif Pro | Image preview here |
| Merriweather | Image preview here |
| PT Serif | Image preview here |
Premium Alternatives
1. Charter (Matthew Carter, 1987)
- Style: Serif, Transitional/Humanist
- Why It’s Similar: Designed by the same creator, Charter shares Georgia’s readability and balanced proportions.
- Key Difference: More compact letterforms, optimized for economical typesetting.
- Price & Availability: Paid — Bitstream.
2. FF Tisa (Mitja Miklavčič, 2008)
- Style: Serif, Slab-Humanist hybrid
- Why It’s Similar: Similar warmth and generous spacing for on-screen reading.
- Key Difference: Slightly heavier serifs and a more contemporary feel.
- Price & Availability: Paid — FontFont/Monotype.
3. Mercury Text (Hoefler & Co., 2001)
- Style: Serif, Transitional
- Why It’s Similar: Maintains strong legibility with Georgia-like proportions.
- Key Difference: More refined stroke contrast and designed for high-end editorial work.
- Price & Availability: Paid — Hoefler & Co.
4. Miller Text (Matthew Carter, 1997)
- Style: Serif, Scotch Roman
- Why It’s Similar: Shares Georgia’s warmth and readability, also from Matthew Carter.
- Key Difference: Inspired by 19th-century Scotch Roman styles with higher contrast.
- Price & Availability: Paid — Font Bureau.
Free Alternatives
5. Source Serif Pro (Frank Grießhammer, 2014)
- Style: Serif, Transitional
- Why It’s Similar: Balanced design for screen and print readability.
- Key Difference: Slightly sharper serifs and more neutral character.
- Price & Availability: Free — Google Fonts.
6. Merriweather (Sorkin Type, 2013)
- Style: Serif, Transitional
- Why It’s Similar: Shares Georgia’s open counters and digital-optimized proportions.
- Key Difference: Slightly friendlier tone with softer curves.
- Price & Availability: Free — Google Fonts.
7. PT Serif (ParaType, 2009)
- Style: Serif, Transitional
- Why It’s Similar: Excellent screen readability with Georgia-like clarity.
- Key Difference: Taller ascenders and more pronounced serifs.
- Price & Availability: Free — Google Fonts.
Recommendation Summary Table
| Font Name | Similarity Score (1–5) | Free/Paid | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charter | ★★★★★ | Paid | Compact, economical typesetting |
| FF Tisa | ★★★★☆ | Paid | Contemporary on-screen reading |
| Mercury Text | ★★★★☆ | Paid | Editorial layouts |
| Miller Text | ★★★★☆ | Paid | Classic-inspired body text |
| Source Serif Pro | ★★★★☆ | Free | Web and print versatility |
| Merriweather | ★★★★☆ | Free | Friendly, readable web text |
| PT Serif | ★★★★☆ | Free | Professional web typography |
Conclusion
For a premium Georgia alternative, Charter is the most closely related, sharing the same designer and similar proportions. If you need free, web-ready options, Merriweather and PT Serif both deliver excellent on-screen performance with their own stylistic touches.
