Lucida Handwriting, designed by Kris Holmes and Charles Bigelow in the early 1990s, is part of the Lucida superfamily and belongs to the casual script category. Unlike traditional cursive typefaces, Lucida Handwriting balances legibility with a natural handwritten flow, making it ideal for invitations, greeting cards, branding, and decorative uses. Its slanted strokes, fluid connections, and humanist touch give it a friendly, personal quality while retaining enough clarity for digital and print applications.
Visual Comparison
| Font Name | Preview (AaBbCc123) |
|---|---|
| Lucida Handwriting | AaBbCc123 |
| Brush Script MT | AaBbCc123 |
| Segoe Script | AaBbCc123 |
| Zapfino | AaBbCc123 |
| Dancing Script | AaBbCc123 |
| Pacifico | AaBbCc123 |
| Allura | AaBbCc123 |
| Great Vibes | AaBbCc123 |
Premium Alternatives
1. Brush Script MT – Robert E. Smith (1942)
- Style: Casual brush script
- Why it’s similar: Informal flow with a handwritten feel
- Key difference: More condensed and dramatic than Lucida Handwriting
- Price: Paid (Monotype, Adobe Fonts)
2. Segoe Script – Microsoft (2000s)
- Style: Casual handwritten script
- Why it’s similar: Shares Lucida’s smooth, approachable handwritten look
- Key difference: Slightly more upright and polished in stroke contrast
- Price: Licensed with Microsoft products
3. Zapfino – Hermann Zapf (1998)
- Style: Elegant calligraphic script
- Why it’s similar: Flourished, humanist cursive quality
- Key difference: Much more ornate and formal compared to Lucida Handwriting
- Price: Paid (Linotype/Monotype, Adobe Fonts)
Free Alternatives
4. Dancing Script – Pablo Impallari (2010)
- Style: Casual script
- Why it’s similar: Flowing letter connections with a friendly tone
- Key difference: Slightly more playful, with looser curves
- Price: Free (Google Fonts)
5. Pacifico – Vernon Adams (2011)
- Style: Bold retro script
- Why it’s similar: Informal, brush-like quality
- Key difference: Chunkier strokes and 1950s-inspired style
- Price: Free (Google Fonts)
6. Allura – Rob Leuschke (2011)
- Style: Elegant script
- Why it’s similar: Smooth and approachable handwritten aesthetic
- Key difference: More refined and delicate compared to Lucida Handwriting
- Price: Free (Google Fonts)
7. Great Vibes – TypeSETit (2012)
- Style: Flowing cursive script
- Why it’s similar: Graceful curves and connected strokes
- Key difference: Leans toward formal elegance, unlike Lucida’s casual tone
- Price: Free (Google Fonts)
Why Designers Love Lucida Handwriting
Designers love Lucida Handwriting because it strikes a balance between friendly informality and practical readability. It brings a personal, handwritten touch without sacrificing clarity, making it versatile for both print and digital projects. Whether for wedding invitations, posters, or casual branding, it offers warmth and personality while staying accessible.
Recommendation Summary Table
| Font Name | Similarity Score | Price | Key Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brush Script MT | 9/10 | Paid | More condensed and dramatic |
| Segoe Script | 8/10 | Paid | Upright, polished, slightly more formal |
| Zapfino | 7/10 | Paid | Highly ornate, less casual |
| Dancing Script | 9/10 | Free | Playful, looser connections |
| Pacifico | 8/10 | Free | Chunkier retro-inspired strokes |
| Allura | 8/10 | Free | More delicate and refined |
| Great Vibes | 7/10 | Free | More formal and elegant feel |
Conclusion
Lucida Handwriting remains a casual script classic, combining legibility with warmth and personality. For paid alternatives, Brush Script MT and Segoe Script offer strong substitutes, while Zapfino provides a more ornate twist. Free options like Dancing Script and Pacifico are playful and approachable, while Allura and Great Vibes provide elegant handwritten vibes. Whether you’re looking for casual invitations, branding, or digital design, Lucida Handwriting and its look-alikes deliver a balance of friendliness and readability.
Typeface Similar to Font 