Mabry, designed by Colophon Foundry, is a quirky grotesque sans-serif that blends the warmth of humanist design with the structure of geometric type. Its slightly irregular proportions, subtle ink-trap-like details, and contemporary personality make it especially popular in fashion, art, and editorial branding. Mabry stands out as both approachable and distinctive, making it a strong choice for brands looking to balance creativity with clarity.
Visual Comparison
| Font Name | Preview (AaBbCc123) |
|---|---|
| Mabry | AaBbCc123 |
| Whyte | AaBbCc123 |
| Graphik | AaBbCc123 |
| Söhne | AaBbCc123 |
| Basis Grotesque | AaBbCc123 |
| Work Sans | AaBbCc123 |
| Space Grotesk | AaBbCc123 |
| Archivo | AaBbCc123 |
Premium Alternatives
1. Whyte – Dinamo
- Style: Grotesque Sans
- Why it’s similar: Shares Mabry’s modern grotesque foundation with slightly quirky character shapes.
- Key difference: Whyte is cleaner and more minimalistic.
- Price: Paid; Dinamo.
2. Graphik – Commercial Type
- Style: Neo-Grotesque Sans
- Why it’s similar: Similar balance of modern clarity and editorial flair.
- Key difference: Graphik is more neutral and widely adaptable.
- Price: Paid; Commercial Type.
3. Söhne – Klim Type Foundry
- Style: Neo-Grotesque Sans
- Why it’s similar: Captures a clean modernist essence close to Mabry’s versatility.
- Key difference: Inspired by Helvetica’s heritage, less playful than Mabry.
- Price: Paid; Klim Type Foundry.
4. Basis Grotesque – Colophon Foundry
- Style: Grotesque Sans
- Why it’s similar: Another Colophon creation, with Mabry’s same DNA of quirkiness and balance.
- Key difference: Basis is more restrained and classic compared to Mabry’s liveliness.
- Price: Paid; Colophon Foundry.
Free Alternatives
5. Work Sans – Wei Huang (Google Fonts)
- Style: Grotesque Sans
- Why it’s similar: Shares the same editorial, contemporary grotesque feel.
- Key difference: Narrower letterforms and slightly more neutral tone.
- Price: Free; Google Fonts.
6. Space Grotesk – Florian Karsten (Google Fonts)
- Style: Modern Grotesque Sans
- Why it’s similar: Bold geometric basis with contemporary quirks.
- Key difference: Angular details and wider spacing make it stand out.
- Price: Free; Google Fonts.
7. Archivo – Omnibus Type (Google Fonts)
- Style: Grotesque Sans
- Why it’s similar: Strong editorial use case and geometric clarity.
- Key difference: Slightly more technical and workmanlike in appearance.
- Price: Free; Google Fonts.
Why Designers Love Mabry
Designers love Mabry because it manages to be both sophisticated and playful. Its irregular yet balanced forms make it especially effective in industries like fashion, music, and creative tech, where brands want to stand apart without losing readability. Mabry’s versatility makes it equally effective in headlines, identity systems, and digital interfaces.
Recommendation Summary Table
| Font Name | Similarity Score | Price | Key Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whyte | 9/10 | Paid | Cleaner, more minimalistic |
| Graphik | 8/10 | Paid | More neutral, adaptable |
| Söhne | 8/10 | Paid | Modernist tone, less playful |
| Basis Grotesque | 7/10 | Paid | More restrained, classic |
| Work Sans | 7/10 | Free | Narrower, more neutral |
| Space Grotesk | 6/10 | Free | Angular details, wider spacing |
| Archivo | 6/10 | Free | Technical and utilitarian appearance |
Conclusion
Mabry is a modern grotesque with character, celebrated for its mix of quirky charm and geometric clarity. For premium substitutes, Whyte and Graphik provide stylish and versatile alternatives, while Söhne and Basis Grotesque lean toward modernist restraint. Free alternatives like Work Sans, Space Grotesk, and Archivo bring accessible, high-quality options for designers seeking a Mabry-like aesthetic.
Typeface Similar to Font 